The
primary reason people older than these “digital natives” are unfamiliar with
computers is because they don’t want to
learn how to use them. Many people older than me (and I am not a spring
chicken) are far more computer savvy than me, because they either have time, or make time, to navigate the net and then freely communicate online.
It is all a matter of choice, asking questions, and trying something new,
whether you are a tween, teen, or a senior citizen.
The history of teenagers
and their novelty as a targeted group is fascinating and something I have
researched before. Marketing strategies for all ages from babies through teens
is still relatively new and a growing source of income for many types of
business. The availability of internet to most young people lends credence to
the concept that teens are growing up with these technologies. In truth, my
eight year-old grandchildren can both play games on a tablet or computer far
more easily than I can; even the four year-old can operate a child’s version of
a tablet loaded with learning games and songs. That indicates there is some truth to these statements. But
there are specific areas of these technologies more appealing to youth culture,
involving teens and tweens more directly, and these often span both teens and
their parents (and even grandparents. Mimi, danah, and Henry are understandably
concerned with the growth and reach of internet culture.
They recognize the
ways social media provide forums for youth to express themselves and acquire
that sense of autonomy all teens desire. Henry reminisces about the limitations
in schools on software, particularly gaming, that he witnessed with his sons.
Nobody recognized the potential of these games to spawn creativity in youths. I
enjoyed all three authors, but found myself relating easily to Henry; perhaps
his voice sounded the most experienced. I especially enjoyed the reflections of
both Henry and danah on their high school experiences; these reminded me of
many of my feelings during my high school years. My best friend moved to
Massachusetts, so internet would have been a delight; instead we only had long
distance calls and long-awaited visits. One positive outcome was my autonomy
and feelings of independence on those visits, to make new friends, and gain
different perspectives. It was limited but if teens can now explore such things
online, and learn from those experiences, that is a very rich outcome. I,
naturally, wanted to move to where I met wonderful new people, was with my best
friend and her family (where I felt
the happiest) and had fun becoming the Debbie I wanted the world to see. I also
loved my parents and friends at home in Weehawken, and was not actually going
anywhere! But the ability to “find myself” (note: this was a big thing in the 1970’s) became
available by being away from the familiar.
I believe, that teens exploring
online communities and social media can find these same possibilities without
traveling away from home. It can be the best of both worlds if used and not
abused. I enjoyed danah’s escape for that reason—she needed the getaway from
her small town and found it online. Which presents the question of
stranger-danger; as a parent, those possibilities frightened me when my kids
were younger and still do. I knew people who pursued friendships through chat
rooms and there were, and probably still are, some unsavory characters out
there. Precautions must be observed and enforced, but online communities offer
many benefits, particularly to teens. As Henry says: “Young people do not need
adults snooping over their shoulders but they do need people who can watch
their backs” (52).
“Gaps and Genres in
Participation” starts with Mimi leading the discussion, illustrating the
differences in opportunities for internet access depending on economics and
culture. The narrow difference in participatory politics among all races is an
encouraging sign for young people in general. As danah points out, usually the
politics that are “noticed” are those of middle-class, privileged kids, and not
the efforts of the poor or working class teens. The goal is to close that gap
with” well-positioned policies and educational interventions” (73). The
discussion of Muslim youth and their struggle to have a voice is discussed by
Henry; in lieu of recent events, that process sadly faces an ever-widening gap.
Teens have always gone to great lengths to thwart any restrictions placed on
them; when danah began to discuss this topic, I wondered how she knew my
kids…As she talks about T-Mobile, Sidekick and the pre-pay option, I was
convinced she knew my older son. He could not afford an iPhone back then, but
always had to have the newest gadgets and
the connectivity that went with them.
Mimi’s observation
through the Digital Youth Project that: ”lower income teens…had more autonomy,
ingenuity, and resourcefulness” (77) seems very true to form. Having worked
with so many students doing shows in two very different areas, and watching my
own kids and their friends, it does seem the kids with less often take on and show more responsibility. However,
as danah states: ”Knowledge and skills matter little when you don’t have the
social connections to open doors to opportunities” (77). She refers to the
story involving the young man whose gang photos on a MySpace account, probably
to fit in and stay safe in his community, jeopardized his entrance to college,
and ticket out of that society. Looking at his situation illustrates one way connected learning
should help kids improve their online status and connect to
things that will benefit their future goals. This type of learning, and these
skills are essential to future success, both personally and professionally, for
all young people.
No comments:
Post a Comment